"Am I therefore become your enemy,because I TELL YOU THE TRUTH...?"
(Galatians 4:16)

Islamic Divorce Ruled Not Valid in Maryland:Custom Allowing Men to End Marriage With Oral Declaration Lacks 'Due Process'

After his wife of more than two decades filed for divorce in Montgomery County Circuit Court, Irfan Aleem responded in writing in 2003, and not just in court.Aleem went to the Pakistani Embassy in the District, where he executed a written document that asserted he was divorcing Farah Aleem.He performed "talaq,"exercising a provision of Islamic religious and Pakistani secular law that allows husbands to divorce their wives by declaring"I divorce thee"three times.In Muslim countries, men have used talaq to leave their wives for centuries. But they can't use it in Maryland, the state's highest court decided this week.The state Court of Appeals issued a unanimous 21-page opinion Tuesday declaring that talaq is contrary to Maryland's constitutional provisions providing equal rights to men and women."Talaq lacks any significant 'due process' for the wife, its use, moreover, directly deprives the wife of the 'due process' she is entitled to when she initiates divorce litigation in this state. The lack and deprivation of due process is itself contrary to this state's public policy," the court wrote.The decision affirms a 2007 ruling by the Court of Special Appeals, the state's intermediate appellate court, which also said that talaq does not apply in the Free State.Under Islamic traditions, talaq can be invoked only by a husband, unless he grants his wife the same right.(1)According to the Court of Appeals' opinion, Irfan Aleem, who worked for years as an economist with the World Bank, is worth about $2 million, half of which Farah Aleem is entitled to under Maryland law. When Irfan Aleem tried to divorce his wife under the concept of talaq, a sum of $2,500 was mentioned as a "full and final" settlement, according to the appellate decision.That amount was written into the marriage contract Farah Aleem signed the day she married him in their native Pakistan in 1980, according to the appellate decision.The contract was in accordance with Pakistani custom. At the time, he was 29 and she was 18. The couple moved to the Washington area in 1985."I don't even know how to express how happy I am. I am ecstatic, relieved," Farah Aleem, 46, said yesterday. Over the years, a lack of financial support from her ex-husband caused hardship for her and her son and daughter, who are in college, she said. "All I ever wanted was my fair share, not a penny more," said Aleem, who lives in the Washington area, works full time for an accounting firm and is pursuing an accounting degree at night.At the direction of the judge who presided over the Aleems' divorce proceedings, the couple's Potomac home was sold, and half the proceeds-about $200,000-went to Farah Aleem, said Susan Friedman, her attorney.
PS:I'm really glad for this lady....Well...here we see a sorry example of a father fleeing responsability and not providing for his children...."I divorce thee"3 times,How Convenient!!!!!....What an example....!!!
(1)of course you know...women are equal to donkeys for muslim husbands it seems.....
As in the days of Noah...