"Ever since China was awarded the Olympic Games and pursued them as a national prestige project, the flame no longer stands for fairness and peace. It now also symbolizes a repressive regime which battles ambitions for autonomy like in Tibet, which hurts human rights and suppresses dissenting opinions.
"That is why demonstrators in London and Paris hurled themselves at the runners bearing the torch around the globe. They want to extinguish it. Beijing is seething with anger and talking of 'sabotage.' It wanted to use the Olympic Games as a stage to present itself in the best light. Now it must look on dumbfounded as it loses control over the organization of the spectacle outside its own borders. The party officials are helplessly watching the protests in Paris and London that are likely to be repeated in San Francisco and Delhi. The torch relay is turning into a political symbol, the damage to the image is increasing with every kilometer."
"The pressure on China is mounting. But so far it appears incapable of finding a way to deal with this challenge."
Conservative newspaper Die Welt writes:
"The Games this year have already produced a new Olympic discipline: torch extinguishing.
"The Olympic flame is intended to demonstrate peace and solidarity among the peoples. In ancient times lighting the torch marked the period during which weapons were put down during the Games and acts of war were forbidden. The fact that it was the Nazis who reintroduced it in 1936 shows how susceptible such a symbolic act is to propaganda. China's dictatorship can't be compared with Hitler's regime. But one has to welcome the fact that demonstrators are now preventing the Communists in Beijing from using the torch relay to present themselves like Leni Riefenstahl did, with terrifying mastery, in her propaganda film 'Olympia.' The torch relay was intended as a triumph but has become a gauntlet for the Chinese -- and given their stubborn attitude in the Tibetan conflict, they only have themselves to blame."
Conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:
"Even (International Olympic Committee President) Jacques Rogge, whose reticence so far has left one unsure whether it amounts to a mockery of Tibet or Olympian naiveté, can no longer deny that sport and politics do belong together when states want to use his help to portray their version of peace. The opponents of this spectacle have turned torch extinguishing into a sport."
"The Games this year have already produced a new Olympic discipline: torch extinguishing.
"The Olympic flame is intended to demonstrate peace and solidarity among the peoples. In ancient times lighting the torch marked the period during which weapons were put down during the Games and acts of war were forbidden. The fact that it was the Nazis who reintroduced it in 1936 shows how susceptible such a symbolic act is to propaganda. China's dictatorship can't be compared with Hitler's regime. But one has to welcome the fact that demonstrators are now preventing the Communists in Beijing from using the torch relay to present themselves like Leni Riefenstahl did, with terrifying mastery, in her propaganda film 'Olympia.' The torch relay was intended as a triumph but has become a gauntlet for the Chinese -- and given their stubborn attitude in the Tibetan conflict, they only have themselves to blame."
Conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:
"Even (International Olympic Committee President) Jacques Rogge, whose reticence so far has left one unsure whether it amounts to a mockery of Tibet or Olympian naiveté, can no longer deny that sport and politics do belong together when states want to use his help to portray their version of peace. The opponents of this spectacle have turned torch extinguishing into a sport."
As in the days of Noah....